I finished watching the interview and found myself thinking about how much time, effort, and commitment artists like Nick Sayers dedicate to their work. I was really struck by the depth of thought behind his projects, as well as his persistence in seeing complex ideas through to completion. As I watched, I had a few “stop and think” moments along the way.
Around the 6-minute mark, Nick talks about how both he and his mother believed he wasn’t good at math until he got his own computer and started programming. This really resonated with me. I think this is the case for many students who believe they are “not math people.” Often, their mathematical interests or strengths don’t emerge until later, or until they encounter the right context or tool. Personally, I didn’t think I liked math until Grade 11, and I didn’t even consider majoring in mathematics until my second year of university. This made me reflect on how important timing and opportunity are in shaping students’ relationships with math.
Between about 18 and 23 minutes, Nick discusses his mathematical sculptures created from everyday materials such as garbage bags, cola bottles, and plastics. This section reminded me that both art and mathematics can be highly accessible if we pay attention to what’s around us. It made me think about how powerful it could be to invite students to see mathematical potential in ordinary, even recycled, materials.
At around 35 minutes, Nick introduces his work with spirographs, which instantly brought back childhood memories. I used to have a spirograph set and loved drawing the intricate, flower-like patterns, but at the time I had no idea there was mathematics behind them. Seeing this now highlights how mathematical ideas can be present in playful, aesthetic experiences long before we formally name or understand the concepts.
Near the end of the interview (around 1:47–1:50), Nick presents his work with space-filling fractals and empires, connecting them to histories of colonization. This part stood out to me as it showed how art, mathematics, culture, and history can be deeply interconnected, rather than existing as separate domains.
What does this artist’s work offer in terms of understanding math–art connections, and what does it offer me as a math teacher?
As a math teacher, I’m fascinated by the many ways mathematical ideas are embedded in Nick’s artwork. While some of his pieces operate at a level of complexity that may not be easily replicated in everyday classroom practice, they open up powerful possibilities for thinking about math–art connections. His use of accessible, everyday materials especially inspires me to think about how recycled or found objects could be used to create math-related art with students. This feels like a meaningful and worthwhile direction to explore, particularly in helping students see mathematics as creative, connected, and present in the world around them.
===========READING REFLECTION ================
Reading: Writing a Mathematical Art Manifesto by Fumiko Futamura
Summary:
This reading builds on a workshop from the 2025 Bridges Conference proceedings,and explores the aim of developing a mathematical art manifesto that frames mathematical art as a form of expressive artistic practice rather than as illustration, demonstration, or pedagogy. The article discusses the historical context of manifestos, examines definitions and examples of works that may be considered mathematical art, and outlines the defining characteristics of an art manifesto. It also incorporates reflections and quotations from mathematical artists and identifies “rejected paradigms” that challenge conventional assumptions about both art and mathematics.
Stop 1:
“Doris Schattschneider wrote in her review of the 2005 Bridges Conference [11] that “Mathematics creates art”; “Mathematics is art”; “Mathematics renders artistic images”; “Hidden mathematics can be discovered in art”; “Mathematics analyzes art”; “Mathematical ideas can be taught through art.”
This quote reminded me of an earlier task in this program with Dr. Nicol, where we were asked to identify mathematics in nature. Examples included patterns in sunflowers and leaves, symmetry in butterflies, as well as fractals and spirals. These observations align closely with Doris Schattschneider’s ideas that mathematics can be understood as art and that hidden mathematics can be discovered through artistic and natural forms. At the same time, I believe that natural beauty involves more than just mathematics, even though mathematics often renders what we perceive as artistic images, such as those associated with the golden ratio. Although traditional mathematics textbooks do not always explicitly connect mathematical concepts to art, I agree with Schattschneider that mathematical ideas can be meaningfully taught and explored through artistic contexts.
Stop 2:
“What is Mathematical Art? I will choose work that meets at least one of the following three criteria: The art
1. is based on a Mathematical phenomenon, or
2. it is generated by a Mathematical process, or
3. it is a personal response to Mathematics by the artist.
Susan Happersett, artist [6]‘
This definition has changed how I view art, as it encourages me to actively consider how mathematics may be embedded within or connected to an artwork before identifying it as mathematical art. However, the third criterion prompted me to reflect more deeply on what a “personal response to mathematics” might mean. Does this suggest that the artwork is intentionally created in response to a specific mathematical concept, such as a piece developed for a mathematics-related project? In many cases, these criteria may be difficult to identify unless the artist explicitly articulates their intent or process. Nevertheless, I understand Happersett’s broader point: mathematical art invites viewers to look beyond surface aesthetics and thoughtfully examine the mathematical ideas underlying the artwork.